关于numa loadbance的死锁分析

admin
admin
admin
101402
文章
87
评论
2022年10月2日05:30:07评论45 views字数 13263阅读44分12秒阅读模式

背景：这个是在3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64 遇到的一例crash。下面列一下我们是怎么排查并解这个问题的。

一、故障现象

Oppo云智能监控发现机器down机：

 KERNEL: /usr/lib/debug/lib/modules/3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/vmlinux  ....       PANIC: "Kernel panic - not syncing: Hard LOCKUP"         PID: 14     COMMAND: "migration/1"        TASK: ffff8f1bf6bb9040  [THREAD_INFO: ffff8f1bf6bc4000]         CPU: 1       STATE: TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (PANIC)
crash> btPID: 14     TASK: ffff8f1bf6bb9040  CPU: 1   COMMAND: "migration/1" #0 [ffff8f4afbe089f0] machine_kexec at ffffffff83863674 #1 [ffff8f4afbe08a50] __crash_kexec at ffffffff8391ce12 #2 [ffff8f4afbe08b20] panic at ffffffff83f5b4db #3 [ffff8f4afbe08ba0] nmi_panic at ffffffff8389739f #4 [ffff8f4afbe08bb0] watchdog_overflow_callback at ffffffff83949241 #5 [ffff8f4afbe08bc8] __perf_event_overflow at ffffffff839a1027 #6 [ffff8f4afbe08c00] perf_event_overflow at ffffffff839aa694 #7 [ffff8f4afbe08c10] intel_pmu_handle_irq at ffffffff8380a6b0 #8 [ffff8f4afbe08e38] perf_event_nmi_handler at ffffffff83f6b031 #9 [ffff8f4afbe08e58] nmi_handle at ffffffff83f6c8fc#10 [ffff8f4afbe08eb0] do_nmi at ffffffff83f6cbd8#11 [ffff8f4afbe08ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff83f6bd69    [exception RIP: native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath+462]    RIP: ffffffff839121ae  RSP: ffff8f1bf6bc7c50  RFLAGS: 00000002    RAX: 0000000000000001  RBX: 0000000000000082  RCX: 0000000000000001    RDX: 0000000000000101  RSI: 0000000000000001  RDI: ffff8f1afdf55fe8---锁    RBP: ffff8f1bf6bc7c50   R8: 0000000000000101   R9: 0000000000000400    R10: 000000000000499e  R11: 000000000000499f  R12: ffff8f1afdf55fe8    R13: ffff8f1bf5150000  R14: ffff8f1afdf5b488  R15: ffff8f1bf5187818    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0018--- <NMI exception stack> ---#12 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c50] native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff839121ae#13 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c58] queued_spin_lock_slowpath at ffffffff83f5bf4b#14 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c68] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave at ffffffff83f6a487#15 [ffff8f1bf6bc7c80] cpu_stop_queue_work at ffffffff8392fc70#16 [ffff8f1bf6bc7cb0] stop_one_cpu_nowait at ffffffff83930450#17 [ffff8f1bf6bc7cc0] load_balance at ffffffff838e4c6e#18 [ffff8f1bf6bc7da8] idle_balance at ffffffff838e5451#19 [ffff8f1bf6bc7e00] __schedule at ffffffff83f67b14#20 [ffff8f1bf6bc7e88] schedule at ffffffff83f67bc9#21 [ffff8f1bf6bc7e98] smpboot_thread_fn at ffffffff838ca562#22 [ffff8f1bf6bc7ec8] kthread at ffffffff838c1c31#23 [ffff8f1bf6bc7f50] ret_from_fork_nospec_begin at ffffffff83f74c1dcrash>

二、故障现象分析

hardlock一般是由于关中断时间过长，从堆栈看，上面的"migration/1" 进程在抢spinlock，由于_raw_spin_lock_irqsave 会先调用 arch_local_irq_disable,然后再去拿锁，而arch_local_irq_disable 是常见的关中断函数,下面分析这个进程想要拿的锁被谁拿着。

x86架构下，native_queued_spin_lock_slowpath的rdi就是存放锁地址的

crash> arch_spinlock_t ffff8f1afdf55fe8struct arch_spinlock_t {  val = {    counter = 257  }}

下面，我们需要了解，这个是一把什么锁。从调用链分析 idle_balance-->load_balance-->stop_one_cpu_nowait-->cpu_stop_queue_work反汇编 cpu_stop_queue_work 拿锁阻塞的代码：

crash> dis -l ffffffff8392fc70/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/stop_machine.c: 910xffffffff8392fc70 <cpu_stop_queue_work+48>:    cmpb   $0x0,0xc(%rbx)
     85 static void cpu_stop_queue_work(unsigned int cpu, struct cpu_stop_work *work)     86 {     87         struct cpu_stopper *stopper = &per_cpu(cpu_stopper, cpu);     88         unsigned long flags;     89      90         spin_lock_irqsave(&stopper->lock, flags);---所以是卡在拿这把锁     91         if (stopper->enabled)     92                 __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper, work);     93         else     94                 cpu_stop_signal_done(work->done, false);     95         spin_unlock_irqrestore(&stopper->lock, flags);     96 }

看起来 需要根据cpu号，来获取对应的percpu变量 cpu_stopper,这个入参在 load_balance 函数中找到的最忙的rq，然后获取其对应的cpu号:

   6545 static int load_balance(int this_cpu, struct rq *this_rq,   6546                         struct sched_domain *sd, enum cpu_idle_type idle,   6547                         int *should_balance)   6548 {....   6735                         if (active_balance) {   6736                                 stop_one_cpu_nowait(cpu_of(busiest),   6737                                         active_load_balance_cpu_stop, busiest,   6738                                         &busiest->active_balance_work);   6739                         }....  6781 }
  crash> dis -l load_balance |grep stop_one_cpu_nowait -B 60xffffffff838e4c4d <load_balance+2045>:  callq  0xffffffff83f6a0e0 <_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore>/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/sched/fair.c: 67360xffffffff838e4c52 <load_balance+2050>:  mov    0x930(%rbx),%edi------------根据rbx可以取cpu号，rbx就是最忙的rq0xffffffff838e4c58 <load_balance+2056>:  lea    0x908(%rbx),%rcx0xffffffff838e4c5f <load_balance+2063>:  mov    %rbx,%rdx0xffffffff838e4c62 <load_balance+2066>:  mov    $0xffffffff838de690,%rsi0xffffffff838e4c69 <load_balance+2073>:  callq  0xffffffff83930420 <stop_one_cpu_nowait>

然后我们再栈中取的数据如下：

最忙的组是：crash> rq.cpu ffff8f1afdf5ab80  cpu = 26

也就是说，1号cpu在等 percpu变量cpu_stopper 的26号cpu的锁。

然后我们搜索这把锁在其他哪个进程的栈中，找到了如下：

ffff8f4957fbfab0: ffff8f1afdf55fe8 --------这个在  355608 的栈中crash> kmem ffff8f4957fbfab0    PID: 355608COMMAND: "custom_exporter"   TASK: ffff8f4aea3a8000  [THREAD_INFO: ffff8f4957fbc000]    CPU: 26--------刚好也是运行在26号cpu的进程  STATE: TASK_RUNNING (ACTIVE)

下面，就需要分析，为什么位于26号cpu的进程 custom_exporter 会长时间拿着 ffff8f1afdf55fe8

我们来分析26号cpu的堆栈：

crash> bt -f 355608PID: 355608  TASK: ffff8f4aea3a8000  CPU: 26  COMMAND: "custom_exporter"..... #3 [ffff8f1afdf48ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff83f6bd69    [exception RIP: try_to_wake_up+114]    RIP: ffffffff838d63d2  RSP: ffff8f4957fbfa30  RFLAGS: 00000002    RAX: 0000000000000001  RBX: ffff8f1bf6bb9844  RCX: 0000000000000000    RDX: 0000000000000001  RSI: 0000000000000003  RDI: ffff8f1bf6bb9844    RBP: ffff8f4957fbfa70   R8: ffff8f4afbe15ff0   R9: 0000000000000000    R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: 0000000000000000    R13: ffff8f1bf6bb9040  R14: 0000000000000000  R15: 0000000000000003    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0000--- <NMI exception stack> --- #4 [ffff8f4957fbfa30] try_to_wake_up at ffffffff838d63d2    ffff8f4957fbfa38: 000000000001ab80 0000000000000086     ffff8f4957fbfa48: ffff8f4afbe15fe0 ffff8f4957fbfb48     ffff8f4957fbfa58: 0000000000000001 ffff8f4afbe15fe0     ffff8f4957fbfa68: ffff8f1afdf55fe0 ffff8f4957fbfa80     ffff8f4957fbfa78: ffffffff838d6705  #5 [ffff8f4957fbfa78] wake_up_process at ffffffff838d6705    ffff8f4957fbfa80: ffff8f4957fbfa98 ffffffff8392fc05  #6 [ffff8f4957fbfa88] __cpu_stop_queue_work at ffffffff8392fc05    ffff8f4957fbfa90: 000000000000001a ffff8f4957fbfbb0     ffff8f4957fbfaa0: ffffffff8393037a  #7 [ffff8f4957fbfaa0] stop_two_cpus at ffffffff8393037a.....    ffff8f4957fbfbb8: ffffffff838d3867  #8 [ffff8f4957fbfbb8] migrate_swap at ffffffff838d3867    ffff8f4957fbfbc0: ffff8f4aea3a8000 ffff8f1ae77dc100 -------栈中的 migration_swap_arg    ffff8f4957fbfbd0: 000000010000001a 0000000080490f7c     ffff8f4957fbfbe0: ffff8f4aea3a8000 ffff8f4957fbfc30     ffff8f4957fbfbf0: 0000000000000076 0000000000000076     ffff8f4957fbfc00: 0000000000000371 ffff8f4957fbfce8     ffff8f4957fbfc10: ffffffff838dd0ba  #9 [ffff8f4957fbfc10] task_numa_migrate at ffffffff838dd0ba    ffff8f4957fbfc18: ffff8f1afc121f40 000000000000001a     ffff8f4957fbfc28: 0000000000000371 ffff8f4aea3a8000 ---这里ffff8f4957fbfc30 就是 task_numa_env 的存放在栈中的地址    ffff8f4957fbfc38: 000000000000001a 000000010000003f     ffff8f4957fbfc48: 000000000000000b 000000000000022c     ffff8f4957fbfc58: 00000000000049a0 0000000000000012     ffff8f4957fbfc68: 0000000000000001 0000000000000003     ffff8f4957fbfc78: 000000000000006f 000000000000499f     ffff8f4957fbfc88: 0000000000000012 0000000000000001     ffff8f4957fbfc98: 0000000000000070 ffff8f1ae77dc100     ffff8f4957fbfca8: 00000000000002fb 0000000000000001     ffff8f4957fbfcb8: 0000000080490f7c ffff8f4aea3a8000 ---rbx压栈在此，所以这个就是current    ffff8f4957fbfcc8: 0000000000017a48 0000000000001818     ffff8f4957fbfcd8: 0000000000000018 ffff8f4957fbfe20     ffff8f4957fbfce8: ffff8f4957fbfcf8 ffffffff838dd4d3 #10 [ffff8f4957fbfcf0] numa_migrate_preferred at ffffffff838dd4d3    ffff8f4957fbfcf8: ffff8f4957fbfd88 ffffffff838df5b0 .....crash> crash>

整体上看，26号上的cpu也正在进行numa的balance动作，简单展开介绍一下numa在balance下的动作在 task_tick_fair 函数中：

static void task_tick_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *curr, int queued){  struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq;  struct sched_entity *se = &curr->se;
  for_each_sched_entity(se) {    cfs_rq = cfs_rq_of(se);    entity_tick(cfs_rq, se, queued);  }
  if (numabalancing_enabled)----------如果开启numabalancing，则会调用task_tick_numa    task_tick_numa(rq, curr);
  update_rq_runnable_avg(rq, 1);}

而 task_tick_numa 会根据扫描情况，将当前进程需要numa_balance的时候推送到一个work中。通过调用change_prot_numa将所有映射到VMA的PTE页表项该为PAGE_NONE，使得下次进程访问页表的时候产生缺页中断，handle_pte_fault 函数会由于缺页中断的机会来根据numa 选择更好的node，具体不再展开。

在 26号cpu的调用链中，stop_two_cpus-->cpu_stop_queue_two_works-->cpu_stop_queue_work 函数由于 cpu_stop_queue_two_works 被内联了，但是 cpu_stop_queue_two_works 调用 cpu_stop_queue_work有两次，所以需要根据压栈地址判断当前是哪次调用出现问题。

    227 static int cpu_stop_queue_two_works(int cpu1, struct cpu_stop_work *work1,    228                                     int cpu2, struct cpu_stop_work *work2)    229 {    230         struct cpu_stopper *stopper1 = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_stopper, cpu1);    231         struct cpu_stopper *stopper2 = per_cpu_ptr(&cpu_stopper, cpu2);    232         int err;    233     234         lg_double_lock(&stop_cpus_lock, cpu1, cpu2);    235         spin_lock_irq(&stopper1->lock);---注意到这里已经持有了stopper1的锁    236         spin_lock_nested(&stopper2->lock, SINGLE_DEPTH_NESTING);.....    243         __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper1, work1);    244         __cpu_stop_queue_work(stopper2, work2);.....    251 }

根据压栈的地址:

 #5 [ffff8f4957fbfa78] wake_up_process at ffffffff838d6705    ffff8f4957fbfa80: ffff8f4957fbfa98 ffffffff8392fc05  #6 [ffff8f4957fbfa88] __cpu_stop_queue_work at ffffffff8392fc05    ffff8f4957fbfa90: 000000000000001a ffff8f4957fbfbb0     ffff8f4957fbfaa0: ffffffff8393037a  #7 [ffff8f4957fbfaa0] stop_two_cpus at ffffffff8393037a    ffff8f4957fbfaa8: 0000000100000001 ffff8f1afdf55fe8 
crash> dis -l ffffffff8393037a 2/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/stop_machine.c: 2440xffffffff8393037a <stop_two_cpus+394>: lea    0x48(%rsp),%rsi0xffffffff8393037f <stop_two_cpus+399>: mov    %r15,%rdi

说明压栈的是244行的地址，也就是说目前调用的是243行的 __cpu_stop_queue_work。

然后分析对应的入参：

crash> task_numa_env ffff8f4957fbfc30struct task_numa_env {  p = 0xffff8f4aea3a8000,   src_cpu = 26,   src_nid = 0,   dst_cpu = 63,   dst_nid = 1,   src_stats = {    nr_running = 11,     load = 556, ---load高    compute_capacity = 18848, ---容量相当    task_capacity = 18,     has_free_capacity = 1  },   dst_stats = {    nr_running = 3,     load = 111, ---load低，且容量相当，要迁移过来    compute_capacity = 18847, ---容量相当    task_capacity = 18,     has_free_capacity = 1  },   imbalance_pct = 112,   idx = 0,   best_task = 0xffff8f1ae77dc100, ---要对调的task，是通过 task_numa_find_cpu-->task_numa_compare-->task_numa_assign 来获取的  best_imp = 763,   best_cpu = 1---最佳的swap的对象对于1号cpu}
crash> migration_swap_arg ffff8f4957fbfbc0 struct migration_swap_arg {  src_task = 0xffff8f4aea3a8000,   dst_task = 0xffff8f1ae77dc100,   src_cpu = 26,   dst_cpu = 1-----选择的dst cpu为1}

根据 cpu_stop_queue_two_works 的代码，它在持有 cpu_stopper:26号cpu锁的情况下，去调用try_to_wake_up ，wake的对象是 用来migrate的 kworker。

static void __cpu_stop_queue_work(struct cpu_stopper *stopper,          struct cpu_stop_work *work){  list_add_tail(&work->list, &stopper->works);  wake_up_process(stopper->thread);//其实一般就是唤醒 migration}

由于最佳的cpu对象为1，所以需要cpu上的migrate来拉取进程。

crash> p cpu_stopper:1per_cpu(cpu_stopper, 1) = $33 = {  thread = 0xffff8f1bf6bb9040, ----需要唤醒的目的task  lock = {    {      rlock = {        raw_lock = {          val = {            counter = 1          }        }      }    }  },   enabled = true,   works = {    next = 0xffff8f4957fbfac0,     prev = 0xffff8f4957fbfac0  },   stop_work = {    list = {      next = 0xffff8f4afbe16000,       prev = 0xffff8f4afbe16000    },     fn = 0xffffffff83952100,     arg = 0x0,     done = 0xffff8f1ae3647c08  }}crash> kmem 0xffff8f1bf6bb9040CACHE            NAME                 OBJSIZE  ALLOCATED     TOTAL  SLABS  SSIZEffff8eecffc05f00 task_struct             4152       1604      2219    317    32k  SLAB              MEMORY            NODE  TOTAL  ALLOCATED  FREE  fffff26501daee00  ffff8f1bf6bb8000     1      7          7     0  FREE / [ALLOCATED]  [ffff8f1bf6bb9040]
    PID: 14COMMAND: "migration/1"--------------目的task就是对应的cpu上的migration    TASK: ffff8f1bf6bb9040  [THREAD_INFO: ffff8f1bf6bc4000]    CPU: 1  STATE: TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE (PANIC)
      PAGE         PHYSICAL      MAPPING       INDEX CNT FLAGSfffff26501daee40 3076bb9000                0        0  0 6fffff00008000 tail

现在的问题是，虽然我们知道了当前cpu26号进程在拿了锁的情况下去唤醒1号cpu上的migrate进程，那么为什么会迟迟不释放锁，导致1号cpu因为等待该锁时间过长而触发了hardlock的panic呢？

下面就分析，为什么它持锁的时间这么长：

 #3 [ffff8f1afdf48ef0] end_repeat_nmi at ffffffff83f6bd69    [exception RIP: try_to_wake_up+114]    RIP: ffffffff838d63d2  RSP: ffff8f4957fbfa30  RFLAGS: 00000002    RAX: 0000000000000001  RBX: ffff8f1bf6bb9844  RCX: 0000000000000000    RDX: 0000000000000001  RSI: 0000000000000003  RDI: ffff8f1bf6bb9844    RBP: ffff8f4957fbfa70   R8: ffff8f4afbe15ff0   R9: 0000000000000000    R10: 0000000000000000  R11: 0000000000000000  R12: 0000000000000000    R13: ffff8f1bf6bb9040  R14: 0000000000000000  R15: 0000000000000003    ORIG_RAX: ffffffffffffffff  CS: 0010  SS: 0000--- <NMI exception stack> --- #4 [ffff8f4957fbfa30] try_to_wake_up at ffffffff838d63d2    ffff8f4957fbfa38: 000000000001ab80 0000000000000086     ffff8f4957fbfa48: ffff8f4afbe15fe0 ffff8f4957fbfb48     ffff8f4957fbfa58: 0000000000000001 ffff8f4afbe15fe0     ffff8f4957fbfa68: ffff8f1afdf55fe0 ffff8f4957fbfa80 
    crash> dis -l ffffffff838d63d2/usr/src/debug/kernel-3.10.0-957.el7/linux-3.10.0-957.el7.x86_64/kernel/sched/core.c: 17900xffffffff838d63d2 <try_to_wake_up+114>:        mov    0x28(%r13),%eax
   1721 static int   1722 try_to_wake_up(struct task_struct *p, unsigned int state, int wake_flags)   1723 {.....   1787          * If the owning (remote) cpu is still in the middle of schedule() with   1788          * this task as prev, wait until its done referencing the task.   1789          */   1790         while (p->on_cpu)---------原来循环在此   1791                 cpu_relax();.....   1814         return success;   1815 }

我们用一个简单的图来表示一下这个hardlock：

    CPU1                                    CPU26    schedule(.prev=migrate/1)               <fault>      pick_next_task()                        ...        idle_balance()                          migrate_swap()          active_balance()                        stop_two_cpus()                                                    spin_lock(stopper0->lock)                                                    spin_lock(stopper1->lock)                                                    try_to_wake_up                                                      pause() -- waits for schedule()            stop_one_cpu(1)              spin_lock(stopper26->lock) -- waits for stopper lock

查看上游的补丁

 static void __cpu_stop_queue_work(struct cpu_stopper *stopper,-          struct cpu_stop_work *work)+               struct cpu_stop_work *work,+               struct wake_q_head *wakeq) {   list_add_tail(&work->list, &stopper->works);-  wake_up_process(stopper->thread);+  wake_q_add(wakeq, stopper->thread); }

三、故障复现

由于这个是一个race condition导致的hardlock，逻辑上分析已经没有问题了，就没有花时间去复现，该环境运行一个dpdk的node，不过为了性能设置了只在一个numa节点上运行，可以频繁造成numa的不均衡，所以要复现的同学，可以参考单numa节点上运行dpdk来复现，会概率大一些。

四、故障规避或解决

我们的解决方案是：

1.关闭numa的自动balance.

2.手工合入 linux社区的 0b26351b910f 补丁

3.这个补丁在centos的 3.10.0-974.el7 合入了:

 [kernel] stop_machine, sched: Fix migrate_swap() vs. active_balance() deadlock (Phil Auld) [1557061]

同时红帽又反向合入到了3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64，所以把centos内核升级到 3.10.0-957.27.2.el7.x86_64也是一种选择。

☆ 作者：Anqing ☆


招聘信息

OPPO互联网云平台团队招聘一大波岗位，涵盖Java、容器、Linux内核开发、产品经理、项目经理等多个方向，请在公众号后台回复关键词“云招聘”查看查详细信息。


你可能还喜欢

一例 centos7.6 内核 hardlock 的解析

OPPO内核性能追踪平台技术实践——记一次奇怪的IO 100%忙问题定位过程

如何进行 kubernetes 问题的排障

OPPO自研ESA DataFlow架构与实践

Docker hung住问题解析系列(一)：pipe容量不够


更多技术干货

扫码关注

OPPO互联网技术

关于numa loadbance的死锁分析 

我就知道你“在看”
关于numa loadbance的死锁分析

原文始发于微信公众号（OPPO数智技术）：关于numa loadbance的死锁分析

  • 左青龙
  • 微信扫一扫
  • weinxin
  • 右白虎
  • 微信扫一扫
  • weinxin
admin
  • 本文由 发表于 2022年10月2日05:30:07
  • 转载请保留本文链接(CN-SEC中文网:感谢原作者辛苦付出)：
                   关于numa loadbance的死锁分析http://cn-sec.com/archives/1097012.html

发表评论

匿名网友 填写信息