CWE-285 授权机制不恰当

admin 2022年1月5日21:05:31CWE(弱点枚举)评论9 views11822字阅读39分24秒阅读模式

CWE-285 授权机制不恰当

Improper Authorization

结构: Simple

Abstraction: Class

状态: Draft

被利用可能性: High

基本描述

The software does not perform or incorrectly performs an authorization check when an actor attempts to access a resource or perform an action.

扩展描述

Assuming a user with a given identity, authorization is the process of determining whether that user can access a given resource, based on the user's privileges and any permissions or other access-control specifications that apply to the resource.

When access control checks are not applied consistently - or not at all - users are able to access data or perform actions that they should not be allowed to perform. This can lead to a wide range of problems, including information exposures, denial of service, and arbitrary code execution.

相关缺陷

  • cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 284 cwe_View_ID: 1000 cwe_Ordinal: Primary

  • cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 284 cwe_View_ID: 699 cwe_Ordinal: Primary

适用平台

Language: {'cwe_Class': 'Language-Independent', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Undetermined'}

Technology: [{'cwe_Name': 'Web Server', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Often'}, {'cwe_Name': 'Database Server', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Often'}]

常见的影响

范围 影响 注释
Confidentiality ['Read Application Data', 'Read Files or Directories'] An attacker could read sensitive data, either by reading the data directly from a data store that is not properly restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to read the data.
Integrity ['Modify Application Data', 'Modify Files or Directories'] An attacker could modify sensitive data, either by writing the data directly to a data store that is not properly restricted, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality to write the data.
Access Control Gain Privileges or Assume Identity An attacker could gain privileges by modifying or reading critical data directly, or by accessing insufficiently-protected, privileged functionality.

检测方法

DM-6 Automated Static Analysis

Automated static analysis is useful for detecting commonly-used idioms for authorization. A tool may be able to analyze related configuration files, such as .htaccess in Apache web servers, or detect the usage of commonly-used authorization libraries.

Generally, automated static analysis tools have difficulty detecting custom authorization schemes. In addition, the software's design may include some functionality that is accessible to any user and does not require an authorization check; an automated technique that detects the absence of authorization may report false positives.

Automated Dynamic Analysis

Automated dynamic analysis may find many or all possible interfaces that do not require authorization, but manual analysis is required to determine if the lack of authorization violates business logic

Manual Analysis

This weakness can be detected using tools and techniques that require manual (human) analysis, such as penetration testing, threat modeling, and interactive tools that allow the tester to record and modify an active session.

Specifically, manual static analysis is useful for evaluating the correctness of custom authorization mechanisms.

These may be more effective than strictly automated techniques. This is especially the case with weaknesses that are related to design and business rules. However, manual efforts might not achieve desired code coverage within limited time constraints.

Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:
  • Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies

Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:
  • Web Application Scanner
  • Web Services Scanner
  • Database Scanners

Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:
  • Host Application Interface Scanner
  • Fuzz Tester
  • Framework-based Fuzzer
  • Forced Path Execution
  • Monitored Virtual Environment - run potentially malicious code in sandbox / wrapper / virtual machine, see if it does anything suspicious

Manual Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:
  • Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
  • Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)

Automated Static Analysis - Source Code

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Cost effective for partial coverage:
  • Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer

Architecture or Design Review

According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:

Highly cost effective:
  • Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
Cost effective for partial coverage:
  • Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)

可能的缓解方案

Architecture and Design

策略:

Divide the software into anonymous, normal, privileged, and administrative areas. Reduce the attack surface by carefully mapping roles with data and functionality. Use role-based access control (RBAC) to enforce the roles at the appropriate boundaries.
Note that this approach may not protect against horizontal authorization, i.e., it will not protect a user from attacking others with the same role.

Architecture and Design

策略:

Ensure that you perform access control checks related to your business logic. These checks may be different than the access control checks that you apply to more generic resources such as files, connections, processes, memory, and database records. For example, a database may restrict access for medical records to a specific database user, but each record might only be intended to be accessible to the patient and the patient's doctor.

MIT-4.4 Architecture and Design

策略: Libraries or Frameworks

Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
For example, consider using authorization frameworks such as the JAAS Authorization Framework [REF-233] and the OWASP ESAPI Access Control feature [REF-45].

Architecture and Design

策略:

For web applications, make sure that the access control mechanism is enforced correctly at the server side on every page. Users should not be able to access any unauthorized functionality or information by simply requesting direct access to that page.
One way to do this is to ensure that all pages containing sensitive information are not cached, and that all such pages restrict access to requests that are accompanied by an active and authenticated session token associated with a user who has the required permissions to access that page.

['System Configuration', 'Installation']

策略:

Use the access control capabilities of your operating system and server environment and define your access control lists accordingly. Use a "default deny" policy when defining these ACLs.

示例代码

This function runs an arbitrary SQL query on a given database, returning the result of the query.

bad PHP

function runEmployeeQuery($dbName, $name){

mysql_select_db($dbName,$globalDbHandle) or die("Could not open Database".$dbName);
//Use a prepared statement to avoid CWE-89

$preparedStatement = $globalDbHandle->prepare('SELECT * FROM employees WHERE name = :name');
$preparedStatement->execute(array(':name' => $name));
return $preparedStatement->fetchAll();

}
/.../

$employeeRecord = runEmployeeQuery('EmployeeDB',$_GET['EmployeeName']);

While this code is careful to avoid SQL Injection, the function does not confirm the user sending the query is authorized to do so. An attacker may be able to obtain sensitive employee information from the database.

The following program could be part of a bulletin board system that allows users to send private messages to each other. This program intends to authenticate the user before deciding whether a private message should be displayed. Assume that LookupMessageObject() ensures that the $id argument is numeric, constructs a filename based on that id, and reads the message details from that file. Also assume that the program stores all private messages for all users in the same directory.

bad Perl

sub DisplayPrivateMessage {

my($id) = @_;
my $Message = LookupMessageObject($id);
print "From: " . encodeHTML($Message->{from}) . "
n";
print "Subject: " . encodeHTML($Message->{subject}) . "n";
print "


n";
print "Body: " . encodeHTML($Message->{body}) . "n";

}

my $q = new CGI;
# For purposes of this example, assume that CWE-309 and

# CWE-523 do not apply.

if (! AuthenticateUser($q->param('username'), $q->param('password'))) {

ExitError("invalid username or password");

}

my $id = $q->param('id');
DisplayPrivateMessage($id);

While the program properly exits if authentication fails, it does not ensure that the message is addressed to the user. As a result, an authenticated attacker could provide any arbitrary identifier and read private messages that were intended for other users.

One way to avoid this problem would be to ensure that the "to" field in the message object matches the username of the authenticated user.

分析过的案例

标识 说明 链接
CVE-2009-3168 Web application does not restrict access to admin scripts, allowing authenticated users to reset administrative passwords. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3168
CVE-2009-2960 Web application does not restrict access to admin scripts, allowing authenticated users to modify passwords of other users. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2960
CVE-2009-3597 Web application stores database file under the web root with insufficient access control (CWE-219), allowing direct request. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3597
CVE-2009-2282 Terminal server does not check authorization for guest access. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2282
CVE-2009-3230 Database server does not use appropriate privileges for certain sensitive operations. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3230
CVE-2009-2213 Gateway uses default "Allow" configuration for its authorization settings. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-2213
CVE-2009-0034 Chain: product does not properly interpret a configuration option for a system group, allowing users to gain privileges. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-0034
CVE-2008-6123 Chain: SNMP product does not properly parse a configuration option for which hosts are allowed to connect, allowing unauthorized IP addresses to connect. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-6123
CVE-2008-5027 System monitoring software allows users to bypass authorization by creating custom forms. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-5027
CVE-2008-7109 Chain: reliance on client-side security (CWE-602) allows attackers to bypass authorization using a custom client. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-7109
CVE-2008-3424 Chain: product does not properly handle wildcards in an authorization policy list, allowing unintended access. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-3424
CVE-2009-3781 Content management system does not check access permissions for private files, allowing others to view those files. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2009-3781
CVE-2008-4577 ACL-based protection mechanism treats negative access rights as if they are positive, allowing bypass of intended restrictions. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-4577
CVE-2008-6548 Product does not check the ACL of a page accessed using an "include" directive, allowing attackers to read unauthorized files. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-6548
CVE-2007-2925 Default ACL list for a DNS server does not set certain ACLs, allowing unauthorized DNS queries. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2007-2925
CVE-2006-6679 Product relies on the X-Forwarded-For HTTP header for authorization, allowing unintended access by spoofing the header. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2006-6679
CVE-2005-3623 OS kernel does not check for a certain privilege before setting ACLs for files. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-3623
CVE-2005-2801 Chain: file-system code performs an incorrect comparison (CWE-697), preventing default ACLs from being properly applied. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2005-2801
CVE-2001-1155 Chain: product does not properly check the result of a reverse DNS lookup because of operator precedence (CWE-783), allowing bypass of DNS-based access restrictions. https://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2001-1155

分类映射

映射的分类名 ImNode ID Fit Mapped Node Name
7 Pernicious Kingdoms Missing Access Control
OWASP Top Ten 2007 A10 CWE More Specific Failure to Restrict URL Access
OWASP Top Ten 2004 A2 CWE More Specific Broken Access Control
Software Fault Patterns SFP35 Insecure resource access

相关攻击模式

  • CAPEC-1
  • CAPEC-104
  • CAPEC-127
  • CAPEC-13
  • CAPEC-17
  • CAPEC-39
  • CAPEC-402
  • CAPEC-45
  • CAPEC-5
  • CAPEC-51
  • CAPEC-59
  • CAPEC-60
  • CAPEC-647
  • CAPEC-76
  • CAPEC-77
  • CAPEC-87

引用

文章来源于互联网:scap中文网

特别标注: 本站(CN-SEC.COM)所有文章仅供技术研究,若将其信息做其他用途,由用户承担全部法律及连带责任,本站不承担任何法律及连带责任,请遵守中华人民共和国安全法.
  • 我的微信
  • 微信扫一扫
  • weinxin
  • 我的微信公众号
  • 微信扫一扫
  • weinxin
admin
  • 本文由 发表于 2022年1月5日21:05:31
  • 转载请保留本文链接(CN-SEC中文网:感谢原作者辛苦付出):
                  CWE-285 授权机制不恰当 http://cn-sec.com/archives/612795.html

发表评论

匿名网友 填写信息

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen: