CWE-119 内存缓冲区边界内操作的限制不恰当
Improper Restriction of Operations within the Bounds of a Memory Buffer
结构: Simple
Abstraction: Class
状态: Stable
被利用可能性: High
基本描述
The software performs operations on a memory buffer, but it can read from or write to a memory location that is outside of the intended boundary of the buffer.
扩展描述
Certain languages allow direct addressing of memory locations and do not automatically ensure that these locations are valid for the memory buffer that is being referenced. This can cause read or write operations to be performed on memory locations that may be associated with other variables, data structures, or internal program data.
As a result, an attacker may be able to execute arbitrary code, alter the intended control flow, read sensitive information, or cause the system to crash.
相关缺陷
-
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 118 cwe_View_ID: 1000 cwe_Ordinal: Primary
-
cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 20 cwe_View_ID: 700 cwe_Ordinal: Primary
适用平台
Language: [{'cwe_Name': 'C', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Often'}, {'cwe_Name': 'C++', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Often'}, {'cwe_Class': 'Assembly', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Undetermined'}]
常见的影响
范围 | 影响 | 注释 |
---|---|---|
['Integrity', 'Confidentiality', 'Availability'] | ['Execute Unauthorized Code or Commands', 'Modify Memory'] | If the memory accessible by the attacker can be effectively controlled, it may be possible to execute arbitrary code, as with a standard buffer overflow. If the attacker can overwrite a pointer's worth of memory (usually 32 or 64 bits), they can redirect a function pointer to their own malicious code. Even when the attacker can only modify a single byte arbitrary code execution can be possible. Sometimes this is because the same problem can be exploited repeatedly to the same effect. Other times it is because the attacker can overwrite security-critical application-specific data -- such as a flag indicating whether the user is an administrator. |
['Availability', 'Confidentiality'] | ['Read Memory', 'DoS: Crash, Exit, or Restart', 'DoS: Resource Consumption (CPU)', 'DoS: Resource Consumption (Memory)'] | Out of bounds memory access will very likely result in the corruption of relevant memory, and perhaps instructions, possibly leading to a crash. Other attacks leading to lack of availability are possible, including putting the program into an infinite loop. |
Confidentiality | Read Memory | In the case of an out-of-bounds read, the attacker may have access to sensitive information. If the sensitive information contains system details, such as the current buffers position in memory, this knowledge can be used to craft further attacks, possibly with more severe consequences. |
检测方法
DM-1 Automated Static Analysis
This weakness can often be detected using automated static analysis tools. Many modern tools use data flow analysis or constraint-based techniques to minimize the number of false positives.
Automated static analysis generally does not account for environmental considerations when reporting out-of-bounds memory operations. This can make it difficult for users to determine which warnings should be investigated first. For example, an analysis tool might report buffer overflows that originate from command line arguments in a program that is not expected to run with setuid or other special privileges.
Detection techniques for buffer-related errors are more mature than for most other weakness types.
DM-2 Automated Dynamic Analysis
Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Binary / Bytecode Quality Analysis
- Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis
- Binary Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Web Application Scanner
- Web Services Scanner
- Database Scanners
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Fuzz Tester
- Framework-based Fuzzer
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Focused Manual Spotcheck - Focused manual analysis of source
- Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Source code Weakness Analyzer
- Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
- Source Code Quality Analyzer
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
- Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
可能的缓解方案
MIT-3 Requirements
策略: Language Selection
Use a language that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
For example, many languages that perform their own memory management, such as Java and Perl, are not subject to buffer overflows. Other languages, such as Ada and C#, typically provide overflow protection, but the protection can be disabled by the programmer.
Be wary that a language's interface to native code may still be subject to overflows, even if the language itself is theoretically safe.
MIT-4.1 Architecture and Design
策略: Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
Examples include the Safe C String Library (SafeStr) by Messier and Viega [REF-57], and the Strsafe.h library from Microsoft [REF-56]. These libraries provide safer versions of overflow-prone string-handling functions.
MIT-10 Build and Compilation
策略: Compilation or Build Hardening
Run or compile the software using features or extensions that automatically provide a protection mechanism that mitigates or eliminates buffer overflows.
For example, certain compilers and extensions provide automatic buffer overflow detection mechanisms that are built into the compiled code. Examples include the Microsoft Visual Studio /GS flag, Fedora/Red Hat FORTIFY_SOURCE GCC flag, StackGuard, and ProPolice.
MIT-9 Implementation
策略:
Consider adhering to the following rules when allocating and managing an application's memory:
MIT-11 Operation
策略: Environment Hardening
Run or compile the software using features or extensions that randomly arrange the positions of a program's executable and libraries in memory. Because this makes the addresses unpredictable, it can prevent an attacker from reliably jumping to exploitable code.
Examples include Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) [REF-58] [REF-60] and Position-Independent Executables (PIE) [REF-64].
MIT-12 Operation
策略: Environment Hardening
Use a CPU and operating system that offers Data Execution Protection (NX) or its equivalent [REF-60] [REF-61].
MIT-13 Implementation
策略:
Replace unbounded copy functions with analogous functions that support length arguments, such as strcpy with strncpy. Create these if they are not available.
示例代码
例
This example takes an IP address from a user, verifies that it is well formed and then looks up the hostname and copies it into a buffer.
bad C
in_addr_t addr;
char hostname[64];
in_addr_t inet_addr(const char cp);
/routine that ensures user_supplied_addr is in the right format for conversion /
validate_addr_form(user_supplied_addr);
addr = inet_addr(user_supplied_addr);
hp = gethostbyaddr( addr, sizeof(struct in_addr), AF_INET);
strcpy(hostname, hp->h_name);
}
This function allocates a buffer of 64 bytes to store the hostname, however there is no guarantee that the hostname will not be larger than 64 bytes. If an attacker specifies an address which resolves to a very large hostname, then we may overwrite sensitive data or even relinquish control flow to the attacker.
Note that this example also contains an unchecked return value (CWE-252) that can lead to a NULL pointer dereference (CWE-476).
例
This example applies an encoding procedure to an input string and stores it into a buffer.
bad C
char dst_buf = (char)malloc(4sizeof(char) * MAX_SIZE);
if ( MAX_SIZE die("user string too long, die evil hacker!");
}
dst_index = 0;
for ( i = 0; i
dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'a';
dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'm';
dst_buf[dst_index++] = 'p';
dst_buf[dst_index++] = ';';
}
else if ('
/ encode to < /
}
else dst_buf[dst_index++] = user_supplied_string[i];
}
return dst_buf;文章来源于互联网:scap中文网
- 左青龙
- 微信扫一扫
-
- 右白虎
- 微信扫一扫
-
评论