CWE-807 在安全决策中依赖未经信任的输入
Reliance on Untrusted Inputs in a Security Decision
结构: Simple
Abstraction: Base
状态: Incomplete
被利用可能性: High
基本描述
The application uses a protection mechanism that relies on the existence or values of an input, but the input can be modified by an untrusted actor in a way that bypasses the protection mechanism.
扩展描述
Developers may assume that inputs such as cookies, environment variables, and hidden form fields cannot be modified. However, an attacker could change these inputs using customized clients or other attacks. This change might not be detected. When security decisions such as authentication and authorization are made based on the values of these inputs, attackers can bypass the security of the software.
Without sufficient encryption, integrity checking, or other mechanism, any input that originates from an outsider cannot be trusted.
相关缺陷
- cwe_Nature: ChildOf cwe_CWE_ID: 693 cwe_View_ID: 1000 cwe_Ordinal: Primary
适用平台
Language: {'cwe_Class': 'Language-Independent', 'cwe_Prevalence': 'Undetermined'}
常见的影响
范围 | 影响 | 注释 |
---|---|---|
['Confidentiality', 'Access Control', 'Availability', 'Other'] | ['Bypass Protection Mechanism', 'Gain Privileges or Assume Identity', 'Varies by Context'] | Attackers can bypass the security decision to access whatever is being protected. The consequences will depend on the associated functionality, but they can range from granting additional privileges to untrusted users to bypassing important security checks. Ultimately, this weakness may lead to exposure or modification of sensitive data, system crash, or execution of arbitrary code. |
检测方法
DM-10 Manual Static Analysis
The effectiveness and speed of manual analysis will be reduced if the there is not a centralized security mechanism, and the security logic is widely distributed throughout the software.
Automated Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Bytecode Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis
- Binary Weakness Analysis - including disassembler + source code weakness analysis
Manual Static Analysis - Binary or Bytecode
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Binary / Bytecode disassembler - then use manual analysis for vulnerabilities & anomalies
Dynamic Analysis with Automated Results Interpretation
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Web Application Scanner
- Web Services Scanner
- Database Scanners
Dynamic Analysis with Manual Results Interpretation
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Fuzz Tester
- Framework-based Fuzzer
- Monitored Virtual Environment - run potentially malicious code in sandbox / wrapper / virtual machine, see if it does anything suspicious
Manual Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Manual Source Code Review (not inspections)
Automated Static Analysis - Source Code
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Source code Weakness Analyzer
- Context-configured Source Code Weakness Analyzer
Architecture or Design Review
According to SOAR, the following detection techniques may be useful:
- Inspection (IEEE 1028 standard) (can apply to requirements, design, source code, etc.)
- Formal Methods / Correct-By-Construction
- Attack Modeling
可能的缓解方案
MIT-14 Architecture and Design
策略: Attack Surface Reduction
Store state information and sensitive data on the server side only.
Ensure that the system definitively and unambiguously keeps track of its own state and user state and has rules defined for legitimate state transitions. Do not allow any application user to affect state directly in any way other than through legitimate actions leading to state transitions.
If information must be stored on the client, do not do so without encryption and integrity checking, or otherwise having a mechanism on the server side to catch tampering. Use a message authentication code (MAC) algorithm, such as Hash Message Authentication Code (HMAC) [REF-529]. Apply this against the state or sensitive data that you has to be exposed, which can guarantee the integrity of the data - i.e., that the data has not been modified. Ensure that a strong hash function is used (CWE-328).
MIT-4.2 Architecture and Design
策略: Libraries or Frameworks
Use a vetted library or framework that does not allow this weakness to occur or provides constructs that make this weakness easier to avoid.
With a stateless protocol such as HTTP, use a framework that maintains the state for you.
Examples include ASP.NET View State [REF-756] and the OWASP ESAPI Session Management feature [REF-45].
Be careful of language features that provide state support, since these might be provided as a convenience to the programmer and may not be considering security.
MIT-15 Architecture and Design
策略:
For any security checks that are performed on the client side, ensure that these checks are duplicated on the server side, in order to avoid CWE-602. Attackers can bypass the client-side checks by modifying values after the checks have been performed, or by changing the client to remove the client-side checks entirely. Then, these modified values would be submitted to the server.
MIT-16 ['Operation', 'Implementation']
策略: Environment Hardening
When using PHP, configure the application so that it does not use register_globals. During implementation, develop the application so that it does not rely on this feature, but be wary of implementing a register_globals emulation that is subject to weaknesses such as CWE-95, CWE-621, and similar issues.
MIT-6 ['Architecture and Design', 'Implementation']
策略: Attack Surface Reduction
Understand all the potential areas where untrusted inputs can enter your software: parameters or arguments, cookies, anything read from the network, environment variables, reverse DNS lookups, query results, request headers, URL components, e-mail, files, filenames, databases, and any external systems that provide data to the application. Remember that such inputs may be obtained indirectly through API calls.
Identify all inputs that are used for security decisions and determine if you can modify the design so that you do not have to rely on submitted inputs at all. For example, you may be able to keep critical information about the user's session on the server side instead of recording it within external data.
示例代码
例
The following code excerpt reads a value from a browser cookie to determine the role of the user.
bad Java
for (int i =0; iCookie c = cookies[i];
if (c.getName().equals("role")) {
}
}文章来源于互联网:scap中文网
- 左青龙
- 微信扫一扫
-
- 右白虎
- 微信扫一扫
-
评论